Development of a hybrid gelatin hydrogel platform for tissue engineering and protein delivery applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, to improve the cellular interaction and protein release of gelatin hydrogels, we reported the development of a new hybrid hydrogel platform as a promising tissue engineering scaffold and drug delivery carrier. The biodegradable, biocompatible hybrid hydrogel platform was fabricated from gelatin methacrylamide (Gel-MA) and arginine based unsaturated non-peptide polycations (Arg-UPEA) through UV photo-crosslinking, combining the favorable properties of gelatin and arginine. The hydrogels were systematically characterized based on their mechanical properties, swelling mechanics, interior morphology, and biodegradation capability. The in vitro biocompatibility study showed that the hybrid hydrogels show better performance than GelMA hydrogels, in terms of cell attachment and proliferation. Therapeutic proteins were loaded into the hydrogels and their release behavior was investigated. The loading and release profiles indicated that the new cationic gelatin hydrogels could significantly improve the protein loading capabilities, and release the proteins in vitro in a sustained manner. The structure-function study indicated that the material composition has a large effect on the properties of the hydrogels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".