MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W177635445

SLA Admission Controller for Reliable MPLS Networks.

2003· article· en· W177635445 on OpenAlexaff
Jian Pu, Md. Mostofa Akbar, E Gowland, Gholamali C. Shoja, Eric G. Manning

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAdmission controlQuality of serviceSession (web analytics)Reliability (semiconductor)ReservationComputer networkMultiprotocol Label SwitchingController (irrigation)Service-level agreementNode (physics)Key (lock)Distributed computingResource (disambiguation)Reliability engineeringOperating systemEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces a reliability conscious Service Level Agreement (SLA) based admission controller for data networks. Previous research on optimal SLA admission control is discussed, especially the modeling of the admission control problem as a type of Knapsack problem and control architectures developed on this principle. To provide provisions for reliability, the basic SLA specifying a user’s desired Quality of Service (QoS) is extended to include reliability requirements. To provide for these, an existing SLA-based admission controller is extended to calculate multiple alternate paths for each session and perform resource reservation on all these paths. In the event of node or link failure, a session can now be quickly switched to one of the alternate paths, maintaining the guaranteed QoS without having to run the full admission algorithm again. Simulations are presented which investigate the impact on system performance and the gains made in reliability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.606
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Optical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207