MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W177686200

The European Neighbourhood Policy: Assessing the EU's Policy toward the Region

2010· book-chapter· en· W177686200 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tom Casier

Bibliographic record

VenueKent Academic Repository (University of Kent) · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPost-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChristian ministryPolitical scienceForeign policyPoliticsMinistry of Foreign AffairsEconomic historyPublic administrationHumanitiesArtHistoryLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a relatively short amount of time, the EU has become one of the world's most powerful and important actors on the world stage. Now for the first time this volume explores the goals and effectiveness of the EU's special approach to foreign policy; how its policy is perceived by outsiders and the ramifications of those views; the EU's relations with its neighbors, as well as countries well beyond its borders; and how the EU has and can promote its values abroad. "One of the most comprehensive studies of the EU foreign policy to date. The EU's foreign policy is not an easy subject to tackle, but the contributors do it in an elegant and cogent manner." —Luciano Bardi, University of Pisa and President of the European Consortium for Political Research Contributors include Irina Angelescu (IHEID, Geneva), Elena Baracani (Italian Institute for Human Sciences), Mara Caira (IULM, Milan), Maurizio Carbone (University of Glasgow), Tom Casier (University of Kent), Natalia Chaban (University of Canterbury), Marta Dassù (Aspen Institute Italia), Khalid Emara (Egyptian Foreign Ministry), Laura C. Ferreira-Pereira (University of Porto), Serena Giusti (ISPI and Catholic University of Milan), Luca Gori (Italian Foreign Ministry), Alberto Heimler (SSPA—Italian Public Administration Graduate School), Martin Holland (University of Canterbury), Joseph S. Joseph (University of Cyprus), Stephan Keukeleire (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and College of Europe), Finn Laursen (Dalhousie University), Francesca Longo (University of Catania), Roberto Menotti (Aspen Institute Italia), Andrew Moravcsik (Princeton University), Philomena Murray (University of Melbourne), Stefania Panebianco (University of Catania), Tomislava Penkova (ISPI, Milan), Lara Piccardo (University of Genoa), Joaquín Roy (University of Miami), Jeremy Shapiro (Brookings Institution), Alfred Tovias (Hebrew University and Leonard Davis Institute for International Relations), Nicola Verola (Italian Foreign Ministry), Bernard Yvars (University of Montesquieu, Bordeaux).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKent Academic Repository (University of Kent)Same topicPost-Soviet Geopolitical DynamicsFrench-language works237,207