p-Cycle-based node failure protection for survivable virtual network embedding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Network Virtualization offers to Physical Infrastructure Provider (PIP) the possibility to smoothly roll out multiple isolated networks on top of his infrastructure. A major challenge in this respect is the embedding problem which deals with the mapping of Virtual Networks (VNs) resources on PIP network. In literature, a number of research proposals have been focused on providing heuristic approaches to solve this NP-hard problem while most often assuming that PIP infrastructure is operational at all time. In virtualization environment a single physical node failure can result in single/multi logical link failure(s) as it effects all VNs with a mapping that spans over. Setup a dedicated backup for each VN embedding, i.e., no sharing, is inefficient in terms of resource usage. To address these concerns, we propose in this work an approach for VN mapping with combined physical node and multiple logical links protection mechanism (VNM-CNLP) that: (a) uses a large scale optimization technique, developed in our previous work, to calculate in a first stage a cost-efficient VN mapping while minimizing the effects of a single node failure in VN layer, and (b) proposes in a second stage link p-Cycle based protection techniques that minimize the backup resources while providing a full VN protection scheme against a single physical node failure and a multiple logical links failure. Our simulations show a clear advantage of VNM-CNLP approach over benchmark in terms of VN backup cost and resources utilization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".