La transmission de la langue française au sein des familles exogames et endogames francophones au Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article examine la transmission de la langue française au Canada entre 1991 et 2011 au Québec et hors du Québec. Une attention plus particulière est portée à l’année de recensement de 2011. Pour cette année de recensement, une analyse plus détaillée est réalisée dans le but de déterminer les facteurs qui peuvent expliquer dans quelles circonstances la langue maternelle française est transmise ou non entre parents et enfants d’âge mineur. Pour ce faire, on utilise le modèle théorique de la transmission culturelle qui met l’accent sur les vecteurs de transmission : transmission verticale, horizontale et oblique. On distingue également les facteurs de transmission qui prennent leur source au sein de la famille et du ménage de ceux qui proviennent de l’environnement immédiat du lieu de résidence, en l’occurrence la sous-division de recensement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".