MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1778980926 · doi:10.4000/aile.1476

La saisie, cette grande oubliée !

2001· article· fr· W1778980926 on OpenAlex
Wynne Wong, Daphnée Simard

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAcquisition et interaction en langue étrangère · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
Topiclinguistics and terminology studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’objectif de cet article est, d’une part, de faire état des différentes conceptualisations de la saisie et, d’autre part, de soulever des problèmes d’ordre terminologique résultant en un manque de cohérence parmi, et à l’intérieur même, de certains écrits traitant de la saisie. Pour ce faire, nous allons tout d’abord faire un retour historique sur l’apparition de la notion de saisie dans les écrits en acquisition des L2. Nous allons ensuite présenter les différentes perspectives trouvées dans les écrits issus du monde anglo-saxon et ceux issus de la francophonie. Ceci nous mènera à traiter de problèmes d’ordre terminologique dans les écrits produits en français. Enfin, nous traiterons de la notion de saisie en enseignement et en acquisition des L2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.857
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it