MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1779426963

A Comparison of Early Results and Patient Satisfaction Rate between Modified Radical Cystectomy with Mainz II Urinary Diversion and Standard Radical Cystectomy with Continent Ileocecal Urinary Diversion

2015· article· en· W1779426963 on OpenAlexaff
Saeed Shakeri, Zeighami Hossein, Mehdi Salehipour, Shakeri Aria, Arash Shakeri, Shahryar Zeighami

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCystectomyMedicineUrinary diversionSurgeryUrinary systemUrologyBladder cancerInternal medicineCancer
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: This study compared the early success, complication and patient satisfaction rates of modified extraperitoneal radical cystectomy (Mainz II urinary diversion) with standard intraperitoneal radical cystectomy (continent ileocecal urinary diversion) in a group of patients with muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Methods: From September 2009 until November 2013, this randomized study enrolled 60 patients with muscle invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder who underwent radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups via block randomization. Group A included 30 patients (28 men and 2 women) who underwent modified small incision extraperitoneal radical cystectomy with a Mainz II urinary diversion. Group B included 30 patients (27 men and 3 women) who had classic intraperitoneal radical cystectomy and ileocecal continent diversion. The data were extracted and analyzed. The patients were followed for one year after surgery. Results: Group A patients had a mean age of 61.47±8.63 years. Group B patients had a mean age of 60.77±6.82 years. There were no statistically significant differences in blood loss, electrolyte and acid-base abnormalities, and early post- operative complication rates between the two groups. However, surgical and hospitalization times were significantly shorter in group A (P<0.001). In addition, patients were mobilized earlier and had shorter nothing by moth time. Patient satisfaction rate was significantly more in group A. Conclusion: Small incision extraperitoneal radical cystectomy and Mainz II urinary diversion is a safe, less complicated, effective and more rapid technique with excellent short term outcome. It seems this technique is a reliable alternative for continent urinary diversion in selected bladder cancer patients, mainly in those with urethral involvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.160
GPT teacher head0.473
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments→French-language works237,207→