MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Affectation des temps et temporalités dans les couples où l’homme est au foyer – une transgression circonscrite

2015· article· fr· W1779719154 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Myriam Chatot

Bibliographic record

VenueInterventions économiques · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Policies and Family
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les couples où l’homme est au foyer présentent une réponse originale aux contraintes de conciliation travail/famille, par rapport aux normes de genre. Dans cet article, à partir d’une enquête exploratoire auprès de « pères au foyer » menée en France, nous nous intéressons aux temporalités dans lesquelles sont inscrites ces hommes et leurs conjointes. Nous montrerons que contrairement à la majorité des femmes au foyer, le temps de ces pères n’est pas toujours affecté en priorité au foyer, puisque de nombreux pères de notre échantillon investissent leur temps dans des activités rémunérées ou personnelles. Ainsi, les pères disposeraient de la possibilité de marquer leur temps comme étant personnel ou familial (et ce même lorsqu’ils ne font pas autant de tâches ménagères qu’ils estiment devoir le faire), là où leurs conjointes semblent affecter leur temps libre (hors du travail salarié) au foyer et à la famille.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.430
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.221
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInterventions économiquesSame topicSocial Policies and FamilyFrench-language works237,207