On the X-ray properties of sub-mm-selected galaxies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present an analysis of the X-ray properties of 35 sub-mm galaxies (SMGs) in the Chandra Deep Field-North region. Using a sample of robust 850 μm-selected galaxies, with sub-arcsecond positions from Spitzer and/or radio counterparts, we find 16 objects (45 ± 8 per cent) with significant X-ray detections in the 2 Ms Chandra data. Six of these SMGs (∼17 ± 6 per cent) have measured X-ray luminosities or upper limits consistent with those expected based on the far-infrared or radio-derived star formation rate, and hence with the X-rays coming solely from star-forming processes. Extrapolating observed X-ray/star formation rate relations to the luminosity of the SMGs, we find that the X-ray-derived star formation rates are typically in the range of 200–2000 M⊙ yr−1. In another seven sources (20 ± 7 per cent of the SMGs) a dominant active galactic nuclei (AGN) contribution to the X-ray emission is required, while in three more it is unclear whether the stellar process or accretion is responsible for the X-rays. Stacking of the X-ray-undetected SMGs reveals a highly significant (7σ) detection. Under the assumption that the stacked X-ray is due to star formation, this gives an average X-ray-derived star formation rate of around 150 M⊙ yr−1. We deduce that the AGN fraction in SMGs based on X-ray observations is 20–29 ± 7 per cent, which is towards the lower limit of previous estimates. Spectral analysis shows that in general, the SMGs are not heavily obscured in the X-ray but most of the SMGs classified as AGN show absorption with column densities in excess of 1022 cm−2. Of the secure AGN, the bolometric luminosity appears to be dominated by the AGN in only three cases. In around 85 per cent of the SMGs, the X-ray spectrum effectively rules out an AGN contribution that dominates the bolometric emission, even if the AGN is Compton thick. The evidence therefore suggests that intense star formation accounts for both the far-infrared and X-ray emission in most SMGs. We argue that, rather than having an especially high AGN fraction or duty cycle, SMGs have a high X-ray detection rate at very faint fluxes partly because of their high star formation rates and, in rarer cases, because the sub-mm emission is from an AGN.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".