MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W178040244

My Mother Wore Pink

2006· article· en· W178040244 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kit Grauer

Bibliographic record

VenueVisual arts research: educational, historical, philosophical, and psychological perspectives · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt Education and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFriendshipSpiritualityPortraitPleaTotemThe artsSociologyAestheticsPsychologyArtVisual artsLawSocial psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

My mother wore pink. It was her favorite color; she wore it, decorated with it, and it symbolized much about her. If the blue her on was her talisman, the color pink was her trademark. For a feminist brought up in the baby boomer era, it both embarrassed and confused me. After her death, last year, I did a search on the symbolic meanings as sociated with pink. Much to my great plea sure it went beyond sugar and spice and everything nice. The four words most asso ciated with pink are: love, friendship, grace, and gentility. That was my mother and my greatest teacher. She taught by example and exemplified the integration and har mony of the physical, intellectual, social, emotional, and spiritual dimensions of her life. Her spirituality was not religious but a spiritual discipline that was experiential and humanistic. From her I learned that my re sponsibility was to serve the needs of the world in the ways that I could. I am an art teacher. My mother made me proud of who I am and what I do. In this a/r/t/ographical piece (Irwin, 2004) I am attempting to tell my mother's story in a way that will provide a resonance with other arts educators and provide a picture of in a portrait unlike what is common in our writings about teacher education. A/r/tography is active and responsive way of presenting requiring attention to what is seen and known and to what is not seen or known. The intention is not to give information but to open up con versations and relationships with, through, and in the company of others. (Gouzoua sis, Grauer, Irwin, & Leggo, 2004) My mother was an exceptional educa tor, although she had no formal training and never presented at conferences around the globe. She was many things to many people: a wife, mother, grandmother, sister, aunt, cousin, neighbor, but most of all a friend. It is in her friendship and compas sion that she most effectively exemplified teaching by living practice. It is clear in the way that I teach and the lessons that mat ter the most to me that my mother's spirit resides. We were very different people, yet, through her example, I was able to under stand teaching and learning in very differ ent ways from my formal education. The deep learning that passes from mother to daughter is a bond of love exemplified. May her story be an inspiration and guide. As you listen to my version of the story, please keep your own story close in your heart, for it is often in the life of others that we can learn truths about our own life's work. Margaret Melrose Taylor was born May 27,1921, to a dashingly handsome English father and an aristocratic Scottish mother (my namesake, Catherine Melrose).Those were the days where there was little tol erance for mixed marriages and Nana's Scottish relatives literally disinherited her for marrying an Englishman. Perhaps it was in that ignorant act that my own moth er's incredible tolerance for other people was born. She had a social consciousness that was highly unusual for her generation and was deeply offended over persecution of any kind. Mom often spoke of her early memo ries of England as a happy time with her two younger brothers, visiting cousins and camping in a caravan. She loved the big house and wonderful riches that were hers to enjoy with her family. Grandpa Taylor was quite the adventurer and moved his family to Vancouver, Canada, a wilderness city built in the beauty of the Northwest coast forests and majestic mountains. It was a far cry from the traditions and intol

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.628

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1880.089

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.266
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVisual arts research: educational, historical, philosophical, and psychological perspectivesSame topicArt Education and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207