De la Aritmética al Álgebra: Números Triangulares, tecnología y ACODESA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El propósito de este documento es el de abordar la articulación entre la aritmética y el álgebra. La literatura habla del pensamiento aritmético o algebraico, sin mencionar la importancia de un pensamiento aritmético- algebraico previo al algebraico. A través de actividades diseñadas para tal efecto, proponemos un acercamiento aritmético y visual, con la intención de promover procesos de visualización matemática, que a su vez, constituirán estructuras cognitivas sobre el control que ejercen los alumnos en la resolución de una tarea matemática. Nuestro diseño está ligado a un marco teórico sobre la acción, en un aprendizaje en colaboración (ACODESA) y uso de tecnología en el aula de Matemáticas. En este estudio, presentaremos nuestro proyecto de investigación entre Québec y México, pero nos restringiremos a los resultados obtenidos con la población mexicana en relación con los números poligonales en la escuela secundaria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".