MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1781478239 · doi:10.33137/rr.v39i4.8919

La tolérance polonaise à travers le prisme de l'intolérance française au XVIe siècle

2003· article· en· W1781478239 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEuropean Political History Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThroneOathConfessionalSilencePledgeNobilityNegotiationSpanish Civil WarPolitical scienceHistoryLawHumanitiesTheologyArtPhilosophyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article analyses the reception in France of the Warsaw Confederation (1573) which established religious tolerance in Poland as Henry of Valois ascended the throne, leaving behind the Kingdom of France rent by civil war. In France, some contemporary accounts prefer not to mention such tolerance and cast a veil of silence over confessional diversity in this part of Christendom. Other writers, equally Catholic but more intransigent, assert that this tolerance is illegal, effectively constituting an oath against the king. Protestants, for their part, are unwilling to promote this model of religious peace, which they do not seek, favouring negotiations between the Valois and the Polish Diet to obtain concessions for French Protestants. Finally, for the crown, what is key in Poland is not so much religious tolerance as the goodwill of the nobility and fidelity to the king.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.415

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it