MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1781905859

The Cultural Economy of Survival: The Mi’kmaq of Cape Breton in the Mid-19th Century

2008· article· en· W1781905859 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueLabour / Le Travail · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsCape Breton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthnologyImmigrationPopulationNova scotiaGeographyIndigenousCapeContext (archaeology)Political scienceHistoryHumanitiesEconomic historySociologyDemographyArchaeologyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By the mid-19th century, the Mi’kmaq of Cape Breton Island, much like the Mi’kmaq on the Nova Scotia mainland, were nearly destitute. The outcome of over two centuries of political, economic, and cultural interaction with Europeans, this condition was exacerbated by the massive influx of Scottish settlers to the island after the end of the Napoleonic Wars – nearly 30,000 between 1815 and 1838. With their lands occupied and access to customary hunting and fishing grounds severely limited, the island’s Mi’kmaw population – estimated to be about 500 in 1847 – adopted numerous economic initiatives to stay alive: they pursued agriculture and wage labour, mobilized older skills toward different occupational niches, and maintained, at least to some extent, customary rounds of seasonal resource procurement. This essay examines this evolving pattern of occupational pluralism, and highlights how customary norms, codes, and behaviours provided part of the logic through which the island’s Mi’kmaw people made decisions about what to do, economically, to survive. Mid-19th century Cape Breton was a contested place as the forces of immigration and settlement exerted new pressures on Mi’kmaw life. This paper is about that changing context and how the island’s indigenous people sought to understand it, negotiate its pressures and possibilities, and blunt its negative effects. Resume Vers le milieu du 19e siecle, les Mi’kmaq de l’ile du cap Breton, comme les Mi’kmaq de la partie continentale de la Nouvelle-Ecosse, etaient presque prives de ressources. Resultat de plus de deux siecles d’interaction politique, economique et culturelle avec les Europeens, cette condition etait aggravee par l’invasion massive des rapatries ecossais sur l’ile a la fin des guerres de Napoleon – presque 30 000 entre 1815 et 1838. Etant donne l’occupation de leur terre et l’acces tres limite a leurs terrains habituels de la chasse et de la peche, la population Mi’kmaw de l’ile – estimee a environ 500 en 1847 – avait adopte de nombreuses initiatives economiques pour rester en vie : ils cherchaient du travail agricole et salarie, utilisaient des competences acquises vers de differents niches occupationnelles, et maintenaient, au moins jusqu’a un certain point, certaines ressources saisonnieres habituelles. Cet article examine cette conception en evolution du pluralisme occupationnel, et met en vedette les normes, les codes et les comportements habituels par lesquels les Mi’kmaw de l’ile avaient pris leurs decisions economiques pour survivre. Le cap Breton du milieu du 19e siecle etait un endroit conteste comme les forces d’immigration et de peuplement ont exerce de nouvelles pressions sur la vie des Mi’kmaw. Cet article met ce changement dans son contexte et explique la facon dont les indigenes de l’ile avaient cherche a comprendre, a negocier ses pressions et ses possibilites, et a emousser ses effets negatifs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.553
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it