MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1782178150

¿Tiempos modernos o tiempos nacionalistas? Los orígenes de los nacionalismos contemporáneos de Quebec y Euskadi (1880-1936)

2010· article· es· W1782178150 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2010
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBasque language and culture studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesIdeologyPhilosophyPoliticsPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RESUMEN: Analizar comparativamente los nacionalismos franco-quebequés y vasco, especialmente en relación con sus orígenes y los ingredientes sociales, políticos e ideológicos que coadyuvan a explicar su aparición y desarrollo, es el objeto central de este trabajo. La ambigüedad discursiva, el radicalismo ideológico y el pragmatismo político que caracterizan a estos movimientos son estudiados desde la perspectiva de sus bases sociales y los cambios introducidos en sus alianzas políticas, lo que explica el «efecto péndulo» que caracteriza la historia de estos nacionalismos. Por tanto, es esencial para clarificar la naturaleza de este fenómeno integrar por un lado las formas de construcción de los estados contemporáneos canadiense y español con la aparición de sociedades nuevas y problemáticas específicas en Quebec y Euskadi. Desde esa perspectiva es posible tratar de entender la aparición de los nacionalismos respectivos, sus reivindicaciones y sus relaciones y desencuentros con los estados español y canadiense. Palabras Clave. Nacionalismo vasco, nacionalismo quebequés, historia comparada, nación e ideología. ABSTRACT: The main object of this study is to compare French-Quebecois and Basque nationalisms, especially as regards their origins and the social, political and ideological ingredients that together help to explain their appearance and development. The discursive ambiguity, the ideological radicalism and the political pragmatism that characterize these movements are studied from the perspective of their social bases and the changes introduced in their political alliances, which explains the «pendulum effect» that characterizes the history of these nationalism. Thus, in order to clarify the nature of this phenomenon it is essential to integrate, on the one hand, the forms of construction of the contemporary Canadian and Spanish states with the appearance of new societies and specific problematic in Quebec and the Basque Country. From this perspective it is possible to try to understand the appearance of the respective nationalism, their claims, their relations and their divergences with the Canadian and Spanish states. Key Words: Basque Nationalism, Québécois Nationalism, comparative history, nation and ideology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.463
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0060.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.141
GPT teacher head0.546
Teacher spread0.405 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it