Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pseudobulbar dysphagia is a common feature of Alzheimer disease (AD) especially in the late stages. In the majority of cases the clinician can select the most appropriate therapeutic modalities based on a thorough history and bedside assessment. The role of videofluoroscopy in managing the dysphagia of AD has not been established. It is unclear whether the weight loss associated with advanced AD can entirely be prevented by optimizing the management of dysphagia. Pneumonia is a common cause of morbidity and death in patients with AD. The risk of pneumonia is related not only to dysphagia and aspiration but to mobility, nutritional status and host immune response. Prevention of pneumonia through appropriate management of dysphagia is not supported by empirical evidence. The potential role of enteral feeding in patients with advanced AD is small. An evidence-based approach to enteral feeding in AD patients is outlined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it