AVO modeling of pressure-saturation effects in Weyburn CO2 sequestration
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Weyburn Field in southeastern Saskatchewan, Canada (Figure 1) was discovered in 1954 and has been water-flooded since the 1960s. In October 2000, injection of CO2 for enhanced oil recovery was started by EnCana, concurrently with a multidisciplinary International Energy Agency Greenhouse Gas (IEA GHG) CO2 Monitoring and Storage Project (CO2MSP). In order to monitor CO2 injection, storage, and oil recovery, several vintages of 3D and 3D/3-C data were acquired, starting with a baseline survey in December 1999. These time-lapse data sets were used to evaluate the quality and safety of CO2 sequestration, and monitor the reservoir pressure front, water flooding, and bypassed oil (White et al., 2004).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it