Single and combined effects of temperature and red:far-red light ratio on evening primrose (<i>Oenothera biennis</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Few studies have considered the interactive effects of temperature and red:far-red light ratio (R:FR) on plants. We studied the effects of these two factors on evening primrose (Oenothera biennis L.). Plants were grown under two temperature regimes (22 °C day – 18 °C night and 28 °C day – 24 °C night) and two R:FR light ratios (low, simulated shade FR enrichment and normal, simulated natural sunlight) in controlled-environment chambers and their growth and physiological characteristics were measured. Among the 23 parameters, 20 were affected by temperature, 21 were affected by light quality, and 16 were affected by their interactions. Higher temperatures increased stem height, photosynthetic pigments, and ethylene, but decreased gas exchange and, in turn, plant biomass. Low R:FR increased stem height, transpiration, stomatal conductance, and ethylene, but decreased photosynthetic pigments, water-use efficiency, and photosynthesis and, in turn, plant biomass. Distinct parallel patterns were found for the combined effects of temperature and light quality. Plants had 2.3 times lower total biomass under lower temperatures at low R:FR than under the same temperatures at normal R:FR. However, plants had 2.8 times lower total biomass under higher temperatures at low R:FR than under the same temperatures at normal R:FR. We conclude that the interactive effects of temperature and R:FR are different than that of the single factors on the natural populations of O. biennis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".