MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Highly Charged Region in the Middle Domain of Plant ER‐Localized HSP90 is Required for ER Stress Resistance

2015· article· en· W1783769656 on OpenAlexaff
Rongmin Zhao, Lisa Chong, Yao Wang, Nanette Gad, Nathaniel D. Anderson, Bhavank Shah

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHeat shock proteins research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHsp90ArabidopsisEndoplasmic reticulumCell biologyHeat shock proteinUnfolded protein responseMutantCytoplasmProteostasisChaperone (clinical)BiologyBiochemistryChemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heat shock protein HSP90 is a highly conserved molecular chaperone that is involved in modulating a multitude of cellular processes under both physiological and stress conditions. In Arabidopsis, there are seven HSP90 isoforms (HSP90.1 to HSP90.7) that are localized in the cytoplasm/nucleus, mitochondrion, chloroplast and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) where protein folding actively takes place. In this study, we analyzed the sequence of ER‐localized Arabidopsis HSP90.7 and the other ER GRP94 proteins from plants and animals, and identified a short, charged region that is specifically present in the middle domain of plant‐derived GRP94 proteins. To understand the role of this charged region, we analyzed transgenic plants that express a mutant protein HSP90.7 Δ22 , which has this charged region deleted. We showed that seedlings expressing HSP90.7 Δ22 have significantly enhanced sensitivity to ER stress induced by tunicamycin or high concentration of calcium, although its general chaperone activity in preventing model protein from heat‐induced aggregation was not significantly affected. We also analyzed the ATP‐binding and hydrolysis activity of both wild type and mutant HSP90.7 proteins, and found that they have slightly different ATP‐binding affinities. Finally, using yeast two‐hybrid screen, we identified a small set of HSP90.7 interactors and showed that the charged region is not required for the candidate client interaction, although it may affect their binding affinity, thus providing potential targets for further investigation of HSP90.7 functions. This work was supported by an NSERC Discovery Grant (371789‐2009) awarded to RZ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicHeat shock proteins researchFrench-language works237,207