MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1783895222 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stt832

SDSS J000555.90−100213.5: a hot, magnetic carbon-dominated atmosphere WD rotating with a 2.1 d period

2013· article· en· W1783895222 on OpenAlexaff
K. A. Lawrie, M. R. Burleigh, P. Dufour, S. T. Hodgkin

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersScience and Technology Facilities Council
KeywordsWhite dwarfPhysicsRotation periodAstrophysicsAtmosphere (unit)Rotation (mathematics)AmplitudePeriod (music)AstronomyStarsMeteorologyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A surprisingly large fraction (70 per cent) of hot, carbon-dominated atmosphere (DQ) white dwarfs are magnetic and/or photometrically variable on short time-scales up to ∼1000 s. However, here, we show that the hot DQ magnetic white dwarf SDSS J000555.90−100213.5 is photometrically variable by 11 per cent on a longer time-scale, with a period of 2.110 ± 0.045 d. We find no evidence of the target fluctuating on short time-scales at an amplitude of ≲±0.5 per cent. Short period hot DQ white dwarfs have been interpreted as non-radial pulsators, but in the case of SDSS J0005−1002, it is more likely that the variability is due to the rotation of the magnetic hot DQ white dwarf. We suggest that some hot DQ white dwarfs, varying on short time-scales, should be more carefully examined to ascertain whether the variability is due to rotation rather than pulsation. All hot DQs should be monitored for long-period modulations as an indicator of rotation and magnetism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→