MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1784546205 · doi:10.4000/osp.4154

Le raccrochage scolaire au Québec : le discours de jeunes adultes québécois inscrits en Centres d'Éducation aux Adultes

2013· article· fr· W1784546205 on OpenAlexaffabout
Aude Villatte, Julie Marcotte

Bibliographic record

VenueL’Orientation scolaire et professionnelle · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicYouth Education and Societal Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nous exposons les résultats obtenus à partir d'entretiens semi-directifs réalisés auprès de 77 jeunes âgés de 18 à 26 ans ayant choisi de « raccrocher » (N = 39) ou de poursuivre leur scolarité (N = 38) dans un Centre d'Éducation aux Adultes (CEA). L'analyse de contenu de leurs propos met en lumière les points positifs et négatifs que ces adultes émergents relèvent quant à leur expérience au sein de ces centres. Les jeunes « raccrocheurs » disent rencontrer plus de difficultés, comparativement à ceux qui ont directement intégré un CEA. Nous discutons des perspectives d'intervention qui en découlent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.233
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueL’Orientation scolaire et professionnelleSame topicYouth Education and Societal DynamicsFrench-language works237,207