MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1784763660 · doi:10.1079/9780851990842.0163

Planning for amenity migration in communities of the British Columbia hinterland.

2006· book-chapter· en· W1784763660 on OpenAlexaffabout
Raymond Chipeniuk

Bibliographic record

VenueCABI eBooks · 2006
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmenityAgency (philosophy)SustainabilityGeographyEnvironmental planningBusinessPolitical scienceSociologyEcologySocial scienceFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter describes a case of collaboration between academic planning researchers and communities of the Bulkley Valley in north-western British Columbia, Canada, in which planning to promote and control amenity migration might make a substantial contribution to economic and social sustainability. The experience of Bulkley Valley indicates that bottom-up planning for amenity migration can benefit from close collaboration between community officials such as planners, administrators, politicians and agency managers, on the one hand, and academic planning researchers on the other.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.704
Threshold uncertainty score0.771

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCABI eBooksSame topicMigration, Aging, and Tourism StudiesFrench-language works237,207