MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Asymptomatic critical hypoglycaemia: a dangerous presentation of glycogen storage disease type Ib in infancy

2011· article· en· W1785858702 on OpenAlexaff
Dirk E. Bock, C. Anthony Rupar, Chitra Prasad

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Paediatrica · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus
Canadian institutionsChildren’s Health Research InstituteChildren's Hospital of Western OntarioLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLactic acidosisGlycogen storage diseaseNeutropeniaAsymptomaticPediatricsKetonuriaInternal medicineHypoglycemiaInsulinEndocrinologySurgeryGastroenterologyPhysiologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UNLABELLED: We report the case of a 3-month-old boy who presented with a 3-day history of respiratory tract infection and poor feeding. He was incidentally found to have profound hypoglycaemia, high-anion-gap lactic acidosis, ketonuria, hyperlipidemia, hepatomegaly, growth failure and neutropenia. Glycogen storage disease type Ib (GSD Ib), an autosomal recessive metabolic defect of the microsomal transporter glucose-6-phosphate-translocase, was suspected and confirmed by genetic testing. Treatment consisted of initial intravenous glucose and fluids to correct his lactic acidosis, followed by a strict dietary protocol consisting of soy-based infant formula enriched with glucose polymers from cornstarch and overnight gastrostomy feeds. CONCLUSIONS: GSD I should be considered in all young children presenting with hypoglycaemia and lactic acidosis. Presence of neutropenia further confirms GSD Ib. Even critical hypoglycaemia can be clinically unapparent in affected children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa PaediatricaSame topicGlycogen Storage Diseases and MyoclonusFrench-language works237,207