Fear of Mexican-Americans and Mexican immigration : integration or a Mexican Quebec?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The United States is going through a major change with the growing influx of non-whites. As of October 2006, at least four states California, Texas, New Mexico, and Hawaii (and also the District of Colombia) are deemed "majority minority states." That is, white Americans are no longer the majority population in these states. A prevalent fear is that other states will soon follow. Scientists at the U.S. Bureau of Census believe that by the year 2050, fifty percent of the U.S. population will consist of ethnic minorities. This means that the United States is becoming a country that is no longer predominantly white and of European origin. Such projections could mean a decline in the social and cultural dominance of white Americans. It is especially the Mexican population that has grown in recent years. They are out-pacing most other ethnic groups and their cultural influence is growing rapidly. They are changing the U.S.A. This is what makes the continuing immigration of Mexicans so scary to some Americans. \n\nIt is in the midst of all these changes that one can hear anti-immigrant voices. Many Americans are terrified of what the U.S.A. is becoming. It is a widely held belief that Mexicans threaten the cultural unity and identity of the U.S.A. Instead of adopting American culture, it is believed, they integrate into a common national culture that promotes ethnic segregation and conflict. Many believe this could result in disintegration. To them, these newcomers threaten the U.S.A. socially, culturally, and economically. The ultimate fear is that, because of their number and culture, they can create two people, two cultures, and two languages. Some Americans have called this re-conquista, Spanish for re-conquest, while others have called it Mexicanization, Hispanization, Latinoization, or a Mexican Quebec. \n\nIn this thesis I have looked at this contemporary fear of Mexican-Americans and Mexican immigration. My thesis has its basis in central questions that deal with Mexican-Americans and Mexican immigrants. Mexicans will continue to come to the U.S.A., and the question of whether they will integrate into American society or continue to live separate lives in separate neighborhoods will be an important one in years to come. This thesis also assess if the fear of Mexicans is unfounded or not. Can Mexicans reconquer the Southwest? Do Mexican-Americans integrate by the second and third generation, just as most previous immigrant groups, or are they resisting integration? Will their presence result in a "Mexicanization" of certain places or even states in the U.S.A.? These are all important questions in this thesis. \n\nThere are many possible factors that create a fear of Mexican-Americans in the United States. These are also the characteristics that make them more threatening. These include their number and persistence, the contiguity between the U.S.A. and Mexico, the historical presence of Mexicans in the U.S.A., the regional concentration, the fact that many of them enter the U.S.A. as illegals, their economic situation, their relation to education, welfare, poverty, and crime and ethno-cultural factors. All these aspects are examined in this thesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".