MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1785962127

Fear of Mexican-Americans and Mexican immigration : integration or a Mexican Quebec?

2006· dissertation· en· W1785962127 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Torunn Finnerud

Bibliographic record

VenueDuo Research Archive (University of Oslo) · 2006
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicImmigration and Intercultural Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMexican americansImmigrationPolitical scienceGender studiesSociologyEthnic groupLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The United States is going through a major change with the growing influx of non-whites. As of October 2006, at least four states California, Texas, New Mexico, and Hawaii (and also the District of Colombia) are deemed "majority minority states." That is, white Americans are no longer the majority population in these states. A prevalent fear is that other states will soon follow. Scientists at the U.S. Bureau of Census believe that by the year 2050, fifty percent of the U.S. population will consist of ethnic minorities. This means that the United States is becoming a country that is no longer predominantly white and of European origin. Such projections could mean a decline in the social and cultural dominance of white Americans. It is especially the Mexican population that has grown in recent years. They are out-pacing most other ethnic groups and their cultural influence is growing rapidly. They are changing the U.S.A. This is what makes the continuing immigration of Mexicans so scary to some Americans. \n\nIt is in the midst of all these changes that one can hear anti-immigrant voices. Many Americans are terrified of what the U.S.A. is becoming. It is a widely held belief that Mexicans threaten the cultural unity and identity of the U.S.A. Instead of adopting American culture, it is believed, they integrate into a common national culture that promotes ethnic segregation and conflict. Many believe this could result in disintegration. To them, these newcomers threaten the U.S.A. socially, culturally, and economically. The ultimate fear is that, because of their number and culture, they can create two people, two cultures, and two languages. Some Americans have called this re-conquista, Spanish for re-conquest, while others have called it Mexicanization, Hispanization, Latinoization, or a Mexican Quebec. \n\nIn this thesis I have looked at this contemporary fear of Mexican-Americans and Mexican immigration. My thesis has its basis in central questions that deal with Mexican-Americans and Mexican immigrants. Mexicans will continue to come to the U.S.A., and the question of whether they will integrate into American society or continue to live separate lives in separate neighborhoods will be an important one in years to come. This thesis also assess if the fear of Mexicans is unfounded or not. Can Mexicans reconquer the Southwest? Do Mexican-Americans integrate by the second and third generation, just as most previous immigrant groups, or are they resisting integration? Will their presence result in a "Mexicanization" of certain places or even states in the U.S.A.? These are all important questions in this thesis. \n\nThere are many possible factors that create a fear of Mexican-Americans in the United States. These are also the characteristics that make them more threatening. These include their number and persistence, the contiguity between the U.S.A. and Mexico, the historical presence of Mexicans in the U.S.A., the regional concentration, the fact that many of them enter the U.S.A. as illegals, their economic situation, their relation to education, welfare, poverty, and crime and ethno-cultural factors. All these aspects are examined in this thesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score0.759

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDuo Research Archive (University of Oslo)Same topicImmigration and Intercultural EducationFrench-language works237,207