Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Femoral Head
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Seven patients with symptomatic osteochondritic lesions of the femoral head are presented. All were male with a mean age of 26 years (16 - 33 years). Two distinct morphologic appearances of the hip joint could be identified. Five patients presented with a coxa valga deformity, four of whom had signs of epiphyseal dysplasia. There were 2 patients whose hips appeared normal apart from the osteochondrontic lesions. In both cases an additional acetabular rim lesion due to a reproducible femoro-acetabular impingement was diagnosed at arthrotomy. This may have acted as the underlying cause of osteochondritis dissecans in these cases. All 7 patients underwent surgical treatment. An intertrochanteric osteotomy (I.O.) alone was performed in 2 patients. Follow-up of these patients at 6.5 and 8.5 years after surgery revealed that the osteochondritic lesions had not healed and one individual remained symptomatic. In the remaining 5 patients, treatment consisted of femoral head dislocation and screw fixation of the osteochondritic lesion. This was combined with an I.O. in two of these patients for coxa valga and osteoplasty of a broad femoral neck in 2 other patients. All lesions had healed at an average follow-up of 4.3 years (2 - 8.5 years). Three patients were asymptomatic and 2 patients had minor residual pain. No progressive osteoarthritic changes or signs of avascular necrosis of the femoral head were observed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".