MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W178652199

Эволюция отношения канадцев к экономическому и военному сотрудничеству с США в 1950-е гг

2014· article· ru· W178652199 on OpenAlex
Еременко Ксения Сергеевна

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueГуманитарные исследования в Восточной Сибири и на Дальнем Востоке · 2014
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSovereigntyPolitical scienceCriticismPolitical economyWorld War IINational identityArrowIdentity (music)EconomySociologyLawEconomicsPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper deals with the evolution of Canadian attitudes toward close cooperation with the US in the sphere of the economy and defense. This cooperation was welcomed throughout the WWII and during the first years after the war, but in the 1950s it was increasingly becoming subjected to criticism as it was thought to infringe national sovereignty of Canada. Analyzing Canadian attitudes to the growth of direct American investment in the Canadian economy, the establishment of NORAD, the Avro Arrow project closure, etc., the author concludes that by the end of the decade Canadians have come to understand the scale of their dependence on the U.S.the knowledge which combined with the growing sense of national identity will lead to search the ways of reducing this dependence in the following decades.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.663
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0100.008
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0060.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it