MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1786549296 · doi:10.1002/ppap.201400195

Thermal Stability of Plasma Generated Oxygenated Functionalities on Carbon Nanotubes

2014· article· en· W1786549296 on OpenAlexaff
Nathan Hordy, Jean‐Luc Meunier, Sylvain Coulombe

Bibliographic record

VenuePlasma Processes and Polymers · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCarbon Nanotubes in Composites
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbon nanotubeX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyRaman spectroscopyArgonOxygenChemical engineeringCarbon fibersMaterials scienceSurface modificationPlasmaThermal stabilityGlow dischargeDecompositionChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)NanotechnologyOrganic chemistryComposite materialComposite number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Colloidal suspensions of functionalized carbon nanotubes (CNT nanofluids) have the potential to be used in a variety of applications, many of which require operation at elevated temperatures. In this study, we examine what effect exposure to an argon/oxygen/ethane RF glow discharge plasma has on the surface chemistry and structure of CNTs and what happens to the plasma‐generated functionalities at high temperatures. An analysis performed using X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy indicates that longer and higher power plasma treatments decrease the sp2 graphitic nature of the CNTs without increasing the degree of oxygen functional groups. Heating of the functionalized‐CNTs up to 350 °C in air and 600 °C in argon, both lead to a substantial decrease in the surface oxygen concentration, which can be attributed to the decomposition of carboxylic functionalities at low temperatures (< 350 °C).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlasma Processes and PolymersSame topicCarbon Nanotubes in CompositesFrench-language works237,207