MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Italy: migration 1815 to present

2013· other· en· W1786959514 on OpenAlex
Federica Bertagna and Marina Maccari‐Clayton

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Encyclopedia of Global Human Migration · 2013
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration and Labor Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmigrationImmigrationWorld War IIEuropean unionGeographyQuarter (Canadian coin)Great DepressionPopulationFirst world warPolitical scienceDictatorshipEconomic historyEconomyDemographic economicsDemographyHistoryAncient historyInternational tradeDemocracyEconomicsPoliticsSociologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract No country captures the global nature of international population movements better than Italy. Italian emigrants accounted for about 10 percent of all international population movements between 1814 and the outbreak of World War I (Gabaccia 2000). Italian emigration endured two world wars, the Great Depression, and 20 years of fascist dictatorship; it resumed at the end of World War II and remained sustained until the early 1970s. Since the last quarter of the 20th century, Italy has become a major receiver for immigrants from all over the world, and in 2008 it ranked fourth among the European Union member states for number of immigrants, surpassed only by Spain, Germany, and the United Kingdom (EUROSTAT 2011).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.596
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it