MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1787251523 · doi:10.1002/jqs.2674

Environmental changes in Baffin Bay during the Holocene based on the physical and magnetic properties of sediment cores

2013· article· en· W1787251523 on OpenAlexafffund
Marie-Pier St-Onge, Guillaume St‐Onge

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Quaternary Science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences
KeywordsGeologyDeglaciationHoloceneRadiocarbon datingTerrigenous sedimentMeltwaterBayEnvironmental magnetismOceanographySedimentSedimentary rockPhysical geographyPaleontologyGlacial period

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The physical and magnetic properties of four long sediment cores (HU2008‐029‐034PC, ‐038PC, ‐042PC and ‐070PC) sampled in Northern (Smith Sound and Jones Sound) and Eastern (Disko Bugt) Baffin Bay were analysed to reconstruct the Holocene environmental changes in Baffin Bay. Radiocarbon dating of each core revealed sedimentation rates of up to 136 cm ka −1 . Except for specific intervals, magnetic properties and ratios reveal that the magnetic remanence is mostly carried by magnetite and that changes in magnetic grain size and concentration are indicative of environmental variations associated with ice‐rafted debris, sea‐ice, meltwater pulses or terrigenous inputs. These variations indicate that all four cores, which cover a period from 12 360 cal a BP to the present, have sedimentary facies that correspond to the major climatic changes of the Holocene: deglaciation and the climatic optimum. In addition, two cores (HU2008‐029‐038PC and ‐070PC) present the signal of two climatic events with a local influence during the Neoglacial period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.661

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Quaternary ScienceSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207