MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1787326613 · doi:10.5430/ijfr.v6n4p68

Factors Affecting Intention to Use Facebook-Banking of Generation Y in Vietnam

2015· article· en· W1787326613 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dinh Xuan Cuong, Pham Thuy Linh, Pham Ngoc Ha

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Financial Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneration yBusinessOrder (exchange)MarketingTechnology acceptance modelService (business)FinanceComputer scienceUsability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To succeed in retail banking requires banks to apply often new technologies in their business to satisfy the various demand of a great amount of individual customers. While many banks have a tendency to provide banking technology applications to customers, generation Y is quite the potential customers, particularly a completely new service called Facebook-banking (FB). Therefore, this paper is conducted in order to evaluate the factors influencing the intention to use FB of generation Y (Gen Y). Basing on the Technology Acceptance Model - TAM (Davis, 1989), our research model is recommended with five factors directly or indirectly affecting the intention to use FB of Gen Y. After analyzing the data collected from our survey, we indicate three major factors influencing Gen Y’s intention to use FB in Vietnam. According to the findings, some recommendations are suggested to banks to provide efficient FB services to Gen Y in Vietnam.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.580
GPT teacher head0.534
Teacher spread0.046 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Financial ResearchSame topicTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourFrench-language works237,207