Reversible Disorganization of the Locomotor Pattern after Neonatal Spinal Cord Transection in the Rat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The central pattern generators (CPGs) for locomotion, located in the lumbar spinal cord, are functional at birth in the rat. Their maturation occurs during the last few days preceding birth, a period during which the first projections from the brainstem start to reach the lumbar enlargement of the spinal cord. The goal of the present study was to investigate the effect of suppressing inputs from supraspinal structures on the CPGs, shortly after their formation. The spinal cord was transected at the thoracic level at birth [postnatal day 0 (P0)]. We examined during the first postnatal week the capacity of the CPGs to produce rhythmic motor activity in two complementary experimental conditions. Left and right ankle extensor muscles were recorded in vivo during airstepping, and lumbar ventral roots were recorded in vitro during pharmacologically evoked fictive locomotion. Mechanical stimulation of the tail elicited long-lasting sequences of airstepping in the spinal neonates and only a few steps in sham-operated rats. In vitro experiments made simultaneously on spinal and sham animals confirmed the increased excitability of the CPGs after spinalization. A left-right alternating locomotor pattern was observed at P1-P3. Both types of experiments showed that the pattern was disorganized at P6-P7, and that the left-right alternation was lost. Alternation was restored after the activation of serotonergic 5-HT(2) receptors in vivo. These results suggest that descending pathways, in particular serotonergic projections, control the strength of reciprocal inhibition and therefore shape the locomotor pattern in the neonatal rat.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".