A Comprehensive Tool for Patient-Specific AAA Geometry and Biomechanics Assessment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Annual mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in the United States alone is approximately 150,000, which is currently ranked as the 13th leading cause of death and the 10th leading cause of death in men over 55 years of age [1]. The vascular surgeon needs to weigh the risk of AAA rupture against the risk of surgical intervention to decide the best course of treatment. Several steps are involved when using computational techniques to evaluate risk of rupture [2], namely medical image segmentation, 3D reconstruction, finite element mesh generation, derivation of boundary conditions, specification of tissue material properties, etc. Currently, computational analysis of AAA biomechanics includes the use of multiple third-party commercial software tools to accomplish each of these steps, which makes its clinical implementation impractical, time-consuming and requiring to interface multiple software tools as this demands an engineering skill set. Additionally, the versatility of general purpose off-the-shelf software comes at the cost of simplifying assumptions regarding geometric modeling, limited user control and boundary conditions. This makes subsequent computational results vulnerable to inaccuracies. In this work, we describe the software tool AAAVASC, built on a MATLAB platform, with an integrated approach for image-based modeling and a novel pipeline that facilitates both geometry quantification and computational analysis of AAA biomechanics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".