MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1787866651 · doi:10.1109/nsemc.1989.37205

Cross-talk and ringing on a multilayer PCB

2003· article· en· W1787866651 on OpenAlexaff
J. Poltz, Anthony S. Wexler

Bibliographic record

VenueNational Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression
Canadian institutionsQuantic EMC (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStriplineNetlistRingingWaveformSolverMicrostripComputer scienceElectronic engineeringCapacitanceInductanceSpiceTopology (electrical circuits)Electrical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringVoltageTelecommunicationsEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A description is given of a new release of Greenfield, a family of analog simulation software tools that simulate the behavior of multilayer printed-circuit boards (PCBs) under high-speed switching conditions. Per unit length inductance, capacitance and resistance matrices-for systems of coupled multiconductor microstrips and striplines-are produced by the two-dimensional Green's function boundary-element field solver Greenfield2d. Greenfield2d supports generation of different SPICE subcircuit models of coupled transmission lines. These models can be subsequently used in Phyllis or any tool which supports SPICE netlist syntax. Cross-sections of multiconductor structures including stripline, microstrip and no-ground connections are shown. The boundary-element procedure is used to generate circuit models for these electromagnetically coupled structures. Time-domain signals and cross-talk waveforms are shown in the time domain.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNational Symposium on Electromagnetic CompatibilitySame topicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise SuppressionFrench-language works237,207