Ceramide inhibits the outward potassium current in rat pinealocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present study, we investigated the effect of ceramide on the outward K(+) current in rat pinealocytes using whole cell and single channel recordings. Three components of the whole cell outward K(+) current were separated, an iberiotoxin (IBTX)-sensitive K(+) current (I(KCa)), a transient A current (I(A)) and a delayed rectifier current (I(K)). C6-ceramide reduced all three components of the outward K(+) current. C6-ceramide (30 microM) caused a 53% inhibition of I(KCa) [a component that is generated by the IBTX-sensitive K(+) channel (BK channel)], a 27% inhibition of I(A) and a 17% inhibition of I(K). Additional studies showed that the BK channel was not inhibited by dihydroC6-ceramide, the inactive analog of C6-ceramide, but mimicked by sphingomyelinase which increased intracellular ceramide. The ceramide inhibition of the BK channel was only partly dependent on its inhibition of the L-type Ca(2+) channel. Studies using specific kinase inhibitors showed that calphostin C (a protein kinase C inhibitor) and to a lesser degree lavendustin A (a tyrosine kinase inhibitor) were effective in reducing the ceramide inhibition of I(KCa). Taken together, our results show that, in rat pinealocytes, ceramide reduces the outward K(+) current predominantly by inhibiting I(KCa). Moreover, protein kinase C appears to be the main kinase involved in the ceramide inhibition of I(KCa).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".