A Song of Loneliness: Women Characters in Of Mice and Men and “Chrysanthemums”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Women characters aren't the main focus of John Steinbeck and his works. Yet, this paper, through the analysis of the women characters in Of Mice and Men and “Chrysanthemums”, is attempting to explore the loneliness and helplessness of the soul of the women during their process of pursuing their dreams that crashed in face of men's absolute power in the society. Key words: women, dream, restrict, loneliness Resume Les personnages feminins n’occupent qu’une petite place dans l’oeuvre de John Steinbeck. Poutant, cet article s’efforce d’etudier, par l’analyse des figures feminines dans Des souris et des hommes et Chrysantheme, la faiblesse et la solitude au fond de l’âme des femmes, qui se situent dans une position defavorable et n’arrivent pas a se liberer des restrictions, dans la lutte contre les hommmes et le processus de la poursuite de leurs reves qui s’aneantissent en face du pouvoir absolu des hommes. Mots cles: les femmes, les reves, les restrictions, la solitude 摘要 女性人物在斯坦貝克的作品中只佔有極小的分量，而本文將通過對《人鼠之間》和《菊》這兩部作品裏的女性人物的分析，來探討當時女性，在與男性的對抗中，在追求自己的夢想，卻由於男性的絕對權力，處於弱勢的女性無法掙脫束縛，夢想破碎，進而幻滅的過程中，所表現出來的靈魂深處的無力與孤獨。 關鍵詞：女性；夢想；束縛；孤獨
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".