MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Field-scale variation of soil phosphorus within small alberta watersheds

2007· article· en· W1788880944 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sheilah C. Nolan, Joanne L. Little, Janna P. Casson, Frank J. Hecker, Barry M. Olson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Soil and Water Conservation · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLandformGrasslandSoil waterEnvironmental scienceTillagePhosphorusHydrology (agriculture)Soil scienceAgronomyGeologyGeomorphologyBiologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Field-scale variation in soil-test phosphorus (STP) and the degree of soil phosphorus saturation (DPS) can affect predictions of phosphorus loss from agricultural soils. Our objectives were to characterize STP and DPS and relate these to topographic characteristics within eight small watersheds in Alberta, Canada. An ungrazed grassland site (2 ha [5 ac]) and seven cultivated sites (22 to 248 ha [54 to 613 ac]) represented a range of tillage and manured conditions. Soils were sampled by landform position at three depths (1 point per 1 to 5 ha [2 to 12 ac]) in fall 2003. Levels of STP in 0 to 2.5 cm (0 to 1 in) were up to two times greater than in 0 to 15 cm (0 to 6 in) at non-manured sites. Within-field variation in STP and DPS was not well related to landform class or topographic index, although some variation was attributable to previous management. Current agronomic sampling strategies should give adequate representations of STP and DPS where management and soil properties are similar.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Soil and Water ConservationSame topicSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsFrench-language works237,207