A Multiple Target Neural Transplantation Strategy for Parkinson's Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intracerebral transplantation of embryonic ventral mesencephalic tissue is a potential treatment for patients with Parkinson's disease for whom medical management is unsatisfactory. Neural transplantation for parkinsonism has been studied experimentally in animal models of Parkinson's disease for more than two decades. These animal studies have shown significant graft survival, synapse formation, graft induced-dopamine release, and behavioural recovery in transplanted animals. Encouraged by these results, clinical programs have been initiated over the past 15 years; more than 250 patients worldwide have undergone neural transplantation. Both animal and clinical studies indicate that neural transplantation has the potential to become a valuable treatment option for Parkinson's disease. However, while many transplant recipients obtain clinically useful symptom relief, in all cases functional recovery is incomplete. Certain symptoms do not respond well to transplant therapy, and those symptoms that do typically do not resolve completely. This has spurred efforts to optimize the transplant procedure. One important approach is exploring novel methods such as multiple site transplantation. This transplantation strategy results in a more complete reinnervation of the dopaminergic circuitry that is affected in Parkinson's disease. In principle, multiple site transplantation should provide a more satisfactory resolution of symptoms. Here we review the progress made in multiple site neural transplantation for Parkinson's disease. The effects of intrastriatal, intranigral, intrasubthalamic nucleus, and intrapallidal grafts in animal models of Parkinson's disease are analysed. The current data suggest that intrastriatal grafts alone are inadequate to promote complete functional recovery. A multiple target strategy may restore dopaminergic input to affected basal ganglia nuclei and improve outcomes of neural transplantation in Parkinson's disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".