Integrative physiology of splanchnic glutamine and ammonium metabolism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The substrates for hepatic ureagenesis are equimolar amounts of ammonium and aspartate. The study design mimics conditions in which the liver receives more NH(+)(4) than aspartate precursors (very low-protein diet). Fasted dogs, fitted acutely with transhepatic catheters, were infused with a tracer amount of (15)NH(4)Cl. From arteriovenous differences, the major NH(+)(4) precursor for hepatic ureagenesis was via deamidation of glutamine in the portal drainage system (rather than in the liver), because there was a 1:1 stoichiometry between glutamine disappearance and NH(+)(4) appearance, and the amide (but not the amine) nitrogen of glutamine supplied the (15)N added to the portal venous NH(+)(4) pool. The liver extracted all this NH(+)(4) from glutamine deamidation plus an additional amount in a single pass, suggesting that there was an activator of hepatic ureagenesis. The other major source of nitrogen extracted by the liver was [(14)N]alanine. Because alanine was not produced in the portal venous system, we speculate that it was derived ultimately from proteins in peripheral tissues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".