Performance des fictions françaises dans une économie de la télécommande
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’œuvre audiovisuelle est un bien particulier autant pour ce qui est de ses conditions de production que pour ce qui concerne ses conditions de diffusion et de consommation. Elle est un compromis entre les exigences du marché et les aspirations de ses créateurs. Son acceptation par les publics n’est connue qu’à sa première diffusion et lors de ses éventuelles rediffusions. L’article présente les traits essentiels du mode de consommation des programmes de fiction puis les stratégies génériques des éditeurs et diffuseurs de programmes (la rareté, la répétition et le lien) et propose un modèle pour l’explication de la performance d’une diffusion. L’analyse est conduite sur un échantillon de 264 soirées où au moins une fiction française est à l’antenne sur les cinq derniers mois des années 2007, 2008, 2009 pour les quatre grandes chaînes historiques françaises : TF1, France 2, France 3 et M6.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".