Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trends in sediments and morphology across the Ebro Delta shoreface were investigated during a three year experiment. The profile slope, the location of morphological features, the textural parameters of the sediment and the relative abundance of sand fractions were measured along the Ebro coast. The observed sediment distribution was compared with the grain size distribution calculated from simple models and with an equilibrium grain size defined from the abundance of textural fractions. On the basis of the cross-shore variations three zones were identified across the Ebro shoreface: high energy, transition and low energy zones. These zones are mainly controlled by the sediment transport processes associated with the incident wave climate. The distribution of these zones is locally disrupted by the presence of shoreface outcrops corresponding to ancient deltaic lobe deposits. The analysis of the sediment distribution is a useful tool in the definition of zones across the shoreface. Sediment distribution is complementary to other zonation criteria (based on morphology and hydrodynamics) and contributes to a better definition of the shoreface units.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.990 | 0.992 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".