MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1790320368 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511783142.014

The role of urban land in climate change

2011· book-chapter· en· W1790320368 on OpenAlexaff
Hilda Blanco, Patricia L. McCarney, Susan Parnell, Marco Schmidt, Karen C. Seto

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLand Use and Ecosystem Services
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimate changeUrbanizationEnvironmental planningHuman settlementLand useUrban climateGovernment (linguistics)Environmental resource managementUrban planningLand managementClimate change mitigationBusinessGeographyNatural resource economicsEconomic growthEconomicsCivil engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Recent IPCC reports have addressed the issue of urban land under the topic of industry, settlement, and society (IPCC, 2007). Since reviews of human settlements from the perspective of climate change have been primarily focused on climate change mitigation, topics of land cover and use, urbanization, land planning and management, land markets, property rights, and fiscal and legal issues, which will be key to responding to impacts of climate change, have not received extensive coverage. We argue in this chapter that it is important to focus on urban land as a sector or as the overarching framework in order to recognize the challenges of government coordination and integration necessary to address climate change. In incorporating urban land in climate change adaptation and mitigation efforts one would be able to include a fundamental set of strategies, such as policies concerning land conversion, land tenure, and urban land markets that have not been fully addressed. This chapter provides an introduction to the role of urban land in climate change, discusses the potential for urban planning and management to address climate change challenges, and reviews current planning efforts focused on climate change. It is organized into several sections. This introductory section develops several key concepts, such as recent trends in urbanization, and discusses their relation to urban land and climate change. The second section focuses on urban form, impacts on ecosystems, including the urban heat island effect, and discusses the vulnerability of informal and slum settlements to climate change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.165
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesFrench-language works237,207