Compact linearly polarized ceramic laser made with anisotropic nanostructured thin films
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel method is proposed for the fabrication of polarizing laser mirrors for compact solid-state lasers using glancing angle deposition. Changing the inclination angle and the azimuthal orientation of the substrate during deposition allows one to create and control in-plane birefringence of a deposited thin film by changing its nanostructure. Principal refractive indices of tungsten trioxide films were determined for various deposition angles using transmission and reflection ellipsometry. High-reflectance contrast between orthogonal linear polarization directions was obtained using a single material without any additional processing steps. These birefringent films were the building blocks of a Bragg mirror that was tested as an output coupler of a (Yb0.1Y0.9)3Al5O12 ceramic laser in a laser-diode end-pumped configuration. Continuous-wave, linearly polarized, transverse single-mode laser emission was obtained at a wavelength of 1030 nm with a polarization extinction ratio higher than 973 (30 dB).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".