MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W179120887

Феминизация названий профессий, должностей, титулов и званий на материале франкоязычной прессы (Франция, Бельгия, Швейцария, Квебек)

2011· article· ru· W179120887 on OpenAlex
Миретина Мария Сергеевна

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueИзвестия Российского государственного педагогического университета им. А. И. Герцена · 2011
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Studies in Language
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPejorativePolysemyConnotationTerminologyLinguisticsEuphemismSociologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The process of feminine forms of the French l words denoting professions, positions, titles, and ranks is described. The article compares the official standards and speech recommendations proposed by various terminology commissions for using the feminine gender in the forms of the above words in France, Belgium, Switzerland and Quebec and the main problems of adaptation of terms in French, such as homonymy, polysemy, euphony and pejorative connotation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.697
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0080.009
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.005
Bibliometrics0.0030.012
Science and technology studies0.0090.011
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0140.008
Research integrity0.0060.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.030

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it