MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<scp>F</scp> reeman, <scp>W</scp> alter <scp>J</scp> . (1895–1972)

2015· other· en· W1791255766 on OpenAlexaff
Brianne M. Collins

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurology and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychosurgeryCriticismNeurosurgeryPsychologyPsychiatryClassicsArtLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Walter Jackson Freeman (1895–1972) pioneered and promoted the use of prefrontal and transorbital lobotomies in the United States. Trained as a neurologist and neuropathologist, Freeman partnered with a neurosurgeon, James Watts, to perform the first North American prefrontal lobotomy in 1936. Freeman later introduced the transorbital lobotomy in 1946. Along with proselytizing the treatment both nationally and internationally, he assisted with and conducted thousands of lobotomies over nearly four decades. Freeman advocated on behalf of lobotomies until his death in 1972. He did so despite increasing criticism, antipsychiatric sentiment, and the rise of pharmacotherapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.059
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.059
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Encyclopedia of Clinical PsychologySame topicNeurology and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207