MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1792512487 · doi:10.54782/jwm.v16i1.102

Ascent of Surface-Released Silver Iodide into Summer Convection Alberta 1975

2012· article· en· W1792512487 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Weather Modification · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsGolder Associates (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSilver iodidePlumeEnvironmental scienceCloud baseMeteorologyAtmospheric sciencesInflowConvectionClimatologyGeologyLayer (electronics)ChemistryGeographyCloud computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the summerof 1975, an experiment was conducted near Calgary, Alberta, Canada,to test the hypothesis that surface-released silver iodide can reach the inflow regions of cumulonimbus clouds. Effluent from point and quasi-area sources of Agl impregnated coke-fueled generators were traced using airborne NCAR Ice nucleus counters. The evidence shows that it is possible for plumes to ascend to give concentrations to up two orders of magnitudeabove background -20 °C (>200 at nuclei per liter) In cloud-base Inflow areas. Targeting was difficult and the horizontal disperslon the plume less of than anticipated. Ice nucleus concentratlons were usually above background levels to the top of the mlxlng layer. Three case studies having relevance to the application of ground-based Agl generators are dlscussed and a summary of flights during convective periods given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.740

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it