L’industrie des produits forestiers au Québec : la crise d’un modèle socio-productif
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article porte sur la crise qui affecte depuis plus de 20 ans l’industrie des produits forestiers du Québec. L’approche socioéconomique qui est ici suivie croise, à travers une perspective diachronique, l’analyse des marchés, des modes d’organisation du travail et de la production, et des règles de gouvernance qui s’appliquent aux entreprises de cette industrie. Le diagnostic aboutit à la conclusion que la combinaison systémique de facteurs de changements de types économique, organisationnel et institutionnel se conjugue à une crise sociale. Cette dernière, portée par différents acteurs, a conduit à remettre en cause l’action et la place qu’occupent les grandes entreprises papetières et à réformer le régime forestier du Québec avec la Loi sur l’aménagement durable du territoire forestier (2010).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".