MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W179352787 · doi:10.3917/inso.146.0132

Pour une adoption sans rupture du lien de filiation d'origine

2008· article· fr· W179352787 on OpenAlexaff
Carmen Lavallée

Bibliographic record

VenueInformations sociales · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Technologies
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'AlimentationRegroupement Québécois sur les Matériaux de Pointe
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLienHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Les revendications relatives à l’accès aux origines des personnes adoptées ont mis en lumière une problématique plus vaste concernant la place de la famille d’origine de l’enfant avant, pendant et après l’adoption. La réflexion sur le sujet s’impose, peu importe la forme d’adoption envisagée, compte tenu du fait que le profil des enfants adoptables est désormais multiple, autant dans les juridictions de droit civil que dans celles de common law .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.038
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.038
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.011
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInformations socialesSame topicReproductive Health and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207