Comparative studies on turbulent fluxes measured over burned and unburned sites of a sagebrush‐dominated mountain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Fire is a major disturbance that causes rangeland change. In this study, we compared the turbulent fluxes of carbon dioxide and sensible and latent heat, measured over burned and unburned sites of a sagebrush‐dominated mountain in southern Idaho during the late summer of 2006. The outcome of the investigation shows that fire altered the horizontal components of turbulence intensity ( i u and i v ) as well as the partitioning of radiant energy between latent and sensible heat fluxes. Average daytime Bowen ratios ( β ) at the burned and unburned sites were 2.03 and 1.87. On the basis of Bowen ratios determined from eddy covariance measurements of sensible and latent heat fluxes, the sensible heat fluxes were relatively more significant at the burned site than at the unburned site most of the time, and the converse was true of the latent heat fluxes. The exception to this was for the few days following heavy rainfall, when near‐surface soil moisture increased the evapotranspiration at the burned site more than at the unburned site until the shallow moisture supply was depleted. By means of ratios of CO 2 /( H + LE), fluxes, carbon sequestration was found to be more significant at the unburned site, declining at both sites as summer progressed but declining more rapidly at the burned site than at the unburned site. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".