MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W179432892

El caso Tony Judt: una carta abierta a la Liga Antidifamación

2008· article· es· W179432892 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mark Lilla, Richard Sennett

Bibliographic record

VenueRepository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia) · 2008
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicComparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of California, San DiegoYork UniversityBard CollegeGeorgetown UniversityLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceQueen Mary University of LondonBilkent ÜniversitesiPrinceton University
KeywordsHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

por Mark Lilla y Richard Sennett, con mas de cien signatarios, se publico en The New York Review of Books (16 noviem bre 2006). Dirigida al director nacional de la Anti-Defamation League, Abraham Foxman, en ella se protesta por el papel des empenado por la ADL en la sus pension de la conferencia que debia pronunciar el historiador Tony Judt en el Consulado de Polonia en Nueva York el 3 de octubre de 2006. El caso Tony Judt: una carta abierta a la Liga Antidifamacion

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia)Same topicComparative constitutional jurisprudence studiesFrench-language works237,207