La defensa de las Islas Baleares durante la primera fase de la segunda guerra mundial (1939-1940)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Titulo: La defensa de las Islas Baleares durante la primera fase de la segunda guerra mundial (1939-1940) Title: The Balearic Islands Defence during the First Stage of the World War II (1939-1940) [ES] Resumen: La situacion geoestrategica de las islas Baleares en el Mediterraneo Occidental las convirtio en una pieza importante durante los primeros meses de la Segunda Guerra Mundial. Conscientes de ello, las autoridades militares espanolas mejoraron sus defensas en prevision de que alguna potencia extranjera quisiese hacerse con su control mediante un desembarco aeronaval. Durante ese periodo el Comandante General de las islas, el general Kindelan, fue informando al ministro del Ejercito, general Varela, de la realidad de la guarnicion y de las defensas de costa. Analizando esa correspondencia y los documentos reservados del Estado Mayor se puede reconstruir ese periodo. Palabras clave: Segunda Guerra Mundial, Ejercito Espanol, general Varela, general Kindelan, Islas Baleares. [EN] Abstract: The geostrategic position of the Balearic Islands in the western Mediterranean became important during the first months of World War II. Aware of this, the Spanish military authorities improved defenses in anticipation of landings by any foreign power in order to take control of the islands. During that period the Minister of Defence, General Varela was informed by the Commander of the Islands, General Kindelan, about the state of the garrison and coastal defenses. Through analysis of correspondence and classified High Command documents one can make a reconstruction of that period. Keywords: World War II, Spanish Army, General Varela, General Kindelan, Balearic Islands.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".