MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1795074296 · doi:10.1109/iscas.1989.100738

System level diagnosis with local constraints

2003· article· en· W1795074296 on OpenAlexaff
Anindya Das, K. Thulasiraman, K. Lakshmanan, V.K. Agarwal

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstraint (computer-aided design)MultiprocessingDomain (mathematical analysis)Computer scienceRing (chemistry)Fault (geology)Local search (optimization)Local area networkTheoretical computer scienceAlgorithmParallel computingMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The concept of a local fault constraint in system-level diagnosis for multiprocessor systems is introduced. Given local constraints, distributed and sequential algorithms for a ring of processors as well as other regular interconnected structures are presented. In all cases considered, the maximum number of faults that can be diagnosed in the local domain is determined. The number of faulty processors that can be diagnosed when information about local constraints is available is significantly larger than what is allowed by the classical t-diagnosis theory. In addition, the number of permissible fault patterns is also significantly higher. These advantages of diagnosis under local constraints over the classical t-diagnosis approach are striking when the connectivity of the system is much smaller than the total number of processors in the system.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.250

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInterconnection Networks and SystemsFrench-language works237,207